The Impact of Modular Learning on Student Comprehension, Motivation, and Skill Development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48094/raudhah.v10i1.855Keywords:
Modular learning, student motivation, cognitive development, psychomotor skills, self-regulated learning, project-based education.Abstract
This study explores the impact of modular learning on Grade 10–12 students at Temasek Independent School using a qualitative descriptive approach through semi-structured interviews. Findings show that focusing on fewer subjects improves comprehension, though challenges like inconsistent scheduling and poor module selection can reduce motivation and self-confidence. Psychologically, students who selected modules based on personal interests showed greater motivation and autonomy, while others experienced disengagement. Project-based learning supported life skill development, particularly in time management, problem-solving, and collaboration. Despite structural inefficiencies, students used adaptive strategies such as self-regulated planning and teacher consultations to manage the system. The study emphasizes the importance of refining modern, flexible learning models to better support student engagement, autonomy, and overall growth.
Keywords: Modular learning, student motivation, cognitive development, psychomotor skills, self-regulated learning, project-based education
References
Bernardo, A. S., & Ramos, M. C. (2020). Effectiveness of modular learning approach in developing self-directed learning skills. Journal of Education and Practice, 11(2), 78–84.
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, 403.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How People Learn, 58.
Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a Theory of Instruction. Harvard University Press.
Dave, R. H. (1970). Psychomotor Levels. In Developing and Writing Behavioral Objectives, 20–21.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum.
Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence, 352.
Harrow, A. (1972). A Taxonomy of the Psychomotor Domain, 190-191
Hassan, A., Rosli, D. I., & Zulkifli, Z. (2019). Modular Approach and Its Impact on Students' Learning Motivation. International Journal of Instruction.
Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Kurikulum Merdeka Documentation.
Kurniawati, Sandra et al. (2014). Education in Indonesia: A White Paper. Brookings Institution.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia Learning, 57–84.
Nugroho, A., & Suryani, D. (2022). Student Engagement in Modular Distance Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran.
Pekrun, R. (2006). The Control-Value Theory of Achievement Emotions. Educational Psychology Review, 317.
Piaget, J. (1973). To Understand is to Invent: The Future of Education. Grossman Publishers.
Pratiwi, & Marhaeni. (2021). Curriculum Reform and Student-Centered Learning in Indonesia. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia).
Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications, 433.
Subekti, L. (2022). Modular Learning: An Effective Strategy for Indonesian Schools. Journal of Educational Development.
Suryadarma, D., & Jones, G. W. (2013). Education in Indonesia: A Snapshot. ISEAS.
Tan, O. S. (2003). Problem-Based Learning Innovation: Using Problems to Power Learning in the 21st Century.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–Value Theory of Achievement Motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81.
Wulf, G., & Shea, C. H. (2002). Principles Derived from the Study of Simple Skills Do Not Generalize to Complex Skill Learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mohammad Rashif Qinthara Sihotang, Mitha Nur Salsabila, Yuma Yudhayana

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.





.png)
